ATESO LABS // RESEARCH ARCHIVE
← Back to Publications Index Falsification Ledger
Draft notes. Not a hardware result.

Frequency Stabilization: Eliminating Non‑Deterministic Runtime Jitter in Grid‑Forming Power Inverters
Pre‑print


ABSTRACT

Grid‑forming inverters must maintain intra‑cycle phase synchronism; a latency τ induces a phase error Δφ = 2πf₀τ. For a 60 Hz system (T₀ = 16.67 ms), the orthodox stability bound requires τ ≪ T₀/2 ≈ 8.33 ms to avoid breaker trips.


1. THE ORTHODOX ASSUMPTION AND ITS PHYSICAL BREAKDOWN

The orthodox argument assumes that any software‑induced latency exceeding half the fundamental period inevitably drives the inverter’s internal phase‑locked loop (PLL) beyond its pull‑in range, causing instantaneous breaker actuation. Formally:

[ > ;; ]

where (T_0 = 1/f_0) is the grid period. This inequality is derived from a linearised swing‑equation model of the inverter’s internal angle δ:

[ = 0 - K_p,e(t-), e(t)=({}-(t)), ]

with (K_p) the proportional gain. Substituting a constant delay τ yields a characteristic equation whose roots cross into the right‑half plane when τ > π/(2K_pω₀). For typical gains (Kₚ≈0.1, ω₀=2π·60 rad/s) the critical delay evaluates to ≈ 8.3 ms, i.e. T₀/2.

Breakdown: Equation (1) treats τ as a worst‑case bound and ignores the statistical distribution of latency. If the runtime guarantees τ ≤ τₘₐₓ with τₘₐₓ ≪ T₀/2, the inequality is never violated, irrespective of occasional spikes beyond τₘₐₓ that are prevented by design. The orthodox proof therefore conflates possible latency with guaranteed latency, a logical flaw that invalidates the claim when a deterministic runtime is employed.


2. MATHEMATICAL FOUNDATION & DERIVATION

2.1 Phase Error Induced by Latency

A pure time delay τ shifts the measured grid angle by

[ = 2f_0 . ]

Stability of a grid‑forming inverter equipped with a synchronous‑reference‑frame PLL requires the phase error to remain inside the pull‑in range Δφₚᵤₗₗ ≈ π/2 rad (90°) for conventional PI gains. Hence the admissible latency satisfies

[ _{}= = . ]

Any τ < τₘₐₓ guarantees that the PLL never leaves its linear region.

2.2 Deterministic Execution Model

Let the control algorithm be expressed as a pure function

[ u[t] = (x[t]), ]

where (x[t]) denotes the sampled inverter states (voltage, current, DC‑link). If () is implemented without dynamic memory allocation, unbounded recursion, or OS‑mediated blocking calls, its worst‑case execution time (WCET) is a constant C independent of input data. Formally,

[ ,x,; (x) C . ]

2.3 Complexity and Thermal Cost

The algorithmic complexity of () is O(1) per control cycle. Assuming a 1 GHz core, the number of cycles consumed is

[ N_{} = f_{} C = 10^{9}^{-6} ^{3};. ]


3. SIMULATION PARAMETERS

Parameter Value Units
gridFrequencyHz 60 Hz
gridCycleDurationMs 16.67 ms

Experimental Setup
- Processor: ARM Cortex‑A53 (1.2 GHz) within a Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC, bare‑metal mode (no OS).
- Benchmark: Periodic invocation of the ATESO Magma control binary at 10 kHz (control period = 100 µs).
- Measurement: This page did not collect samples. The 10⁹ count and the p99.99 latency are stated, not a logic-analyzer reading.
- Baseline: Identical binary linked against a managed runtime (e.g., .NET Core 7 with Server GC) executing the same algorithm. This page did not measure that latency.


4. MISSION‑CRITICAL INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS

Application Requirement ATESO Magma Impact
Renewable Microgrids (islanded) Sub‑cycle frequency regulation < 5 ms —
Phased‑Array Inverters (radar, 5G) Beam‑forming phase coherence < 0.1° —
Utility‑Scale Grid‑Forming Storage Inertial emulation, < 1 ms response —
HVDC Modular Multilevel Converters (MMC) Sub‑µs gate‑signal timing for SM balancing —

5. REPRODUCIBILITY & HARNESS CODE SPECIFICATION

5.1 Software Artifact

5.2 Harness (Pseudo‑C)

/* entry point – called by timer ISR at 10 kHz */
void control_isr(void) {
    uint32_t t_start = DWT->CYCCNT;          // cycle counter
    // ---- deterministic kernel ----
    float v_dq[2] = {adc_read(Vd), adc_read(Vq)};
    float i_dq[2] = {adc_read(Id), adc_read(Iq)};
    float u_dq[2] = magma_control(v_dq, i_dq); // pure function, no alloc
    pwm_set_duty(u_dq[0], u_dq[1]);            // update inverter legs
    // --------------------------------
    uint32_t t_end = DWT->CYCCNT;
    latency_us = (t_end - t_start) / (CPU_MHZ); // store for stats
}

5.3 Measurement Procedure

  1. Flash binary to target board.
  2. Enable 10 k

← Return to Index